Legal Opinion

Burford v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 23, 1940No. 28975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

This action was originally brought against Zora Mitchell, the maker of the note, who answered pleading payment of the note. Before trial she died and the action was revived in the name of her administrator. An amended petition was filed, and the administrator filed answer alleging in effect that the note was executed by the maker to her husband, the payee, in connection with an agreed settlement of property interests between the parties, existing by reason of their marital status, and that the note was thereafter paid by her to the payee. The two answers alleged generally that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elling v. Bank of JeffersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Brummett v. McGowanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Price v. Latimer County Nat. Bank of WilburtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Curry v. DelanaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Davis v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edens v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Oppenheim v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Clayton State Bank v. GoldesberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. McBride v. TunnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API