Legal Opinion

Brummett v. McGowan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1933No. 21584PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The defendant in error, as plaintiff, commenced an action before a justice of the peace of Tulsa county against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, to collect a balance due on a promissory note payable to the plaintiff, that had been executed by the defendants. Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants appealed to the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, where by permission of that court the defendants filed an answer in which they alleged, as stated in their brief:

“Eirst: That said note sued upon is void for the reason that the consideration given therefor was the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eash v. PenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City National Bank of Fort Smith, Arkansas v. VanderboomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968
  2. Anderson v. TwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DearmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Burford v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Cole v. UlreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API