Legal Opinion

Edens v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1957No. 37622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by defendant in error, plaintiff below, to recover from plaintiffs in error, defendants below, one-half of the cost of paving a street adjacent to Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Edens’ Resubdivision of Brockman’s Addition, Tulsa, Oklahoma. The parties will be referred to hereinafter by their trial court designations.

The facts disclose that defendants -were owners of property that prior to March, 1954, was generally described as Lots 7 & 8, Brockman’s Subdivision, Tulsa, Oklahoma; that on March 9, 1954, they entered into a written contract with plaintiff for the sale of this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Webb v. MoranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Steen v. PottsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Arkansas Valley Town & Land Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Nelson v. HamraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Banks v. City of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lively v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. McCraw v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Lively v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API