McBride v. Tunnell

HALLEY, Vice Chief Justice.

Parties will be referred to by name or as they appeared in the trial court.

This controversy arose out of a misunderstanding about the organization of a corpo*410ration. It appears that the plaintiff, Tun-nell, and a man by the name of Clyde Mes-sick, discussed among themselves the organization of a perforating company. The defendant, McBride, was to come into the company to operate it. The three, Tunnell, McBride and Messick, were to own a one-third interest each. It was decided by the three of them that George Capehart would be taken into the company and the four would…