Legal Opinion

Seavey v. Walker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1886No. 12,562PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Niblack, J,

On the 23d day of June, 1884, Jacob Lew *79was, and for some time previously had been, engaged in the tin, stove and hardware business at the town of Markle, in Huntington county. He was at that time indebted to Gideon W. Seavey in a sum of money ranging somewhere between seven hundred and one thousand dollars, and to the firm of Morgan & Beach in about the sum of four hundred and forty dollars. Being unable to pay these sums of money, and, otherwise in a pecuniarily embarrassed condition, Lew agreed to sell and transfer to the said Seavey, and the said Morgan' & Beach, all his goods…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Cox v. RatcliffeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Curme, Dunn & Co. v. RauhIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Beatty v. BrummettIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Doolittle v. J. C. Murray & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Bilbo v. BallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Roudebush v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. South Branch Lumber Co. v. StearnsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API