Legal Opinion
Curme, Dunn & Co. v. Rauh
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1885No. 11,622PublishedCited by 28 opinions
From the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
This was an action by the appellants *248against the appellees to recover the possession of personal property, alleged to be unlawfully detained by the defendants from the plaintiffs.
The defendants answered by a general denial and a special plea of property in themselves. The plaintiffs replied in denial of the special plea.
The issues were tried by a jury who returned a verdict for the plaintiffs against the defendants Bickle and Dougan, and in favor of the defendants Curme, Dunn & Co. Curme, Dunn & Co. were a corporation. A motion by the defendants Bickle and Dougan for a new…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rhodes v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Bradshaw v. WarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Dunbar v. RawlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Breckenridge v. McAfeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Painter v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Towns v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. v. Seal, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Alexander v. SwackhamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Dye v. BattlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.