Roudebush v. Nash

Appellee instituted a replevin action against the appellant. The issues in the case were closed by the parties, and a trial by the court resulted in a finding'and judgment in favor of the appellee. Appellant filed his motion and reasons for a new trial on the grounds that the finding of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law. Motion for a new trial was overruled, and appellant excepted arid consummated this appeal, assigning as error the overruling of such motion.

This appeal presents for decision a controversy between the parties growing out of the following…