State v. Blasingame
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for delivery of marijuana, ORS 475.860. He asserts that the trial court erred when it instructed the jury on the charge of delivery of a controlled substance because that instruction was an impermissible comment on the evidence in violation of ORCP 59 E and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that defendant failed to preserve the arguments that he now raises on appeal and, even assuming without deciding that any' error was plain, we decline to exercise our…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. LogstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- John Hyland Const., Inc. v. Williamsen & Bleid, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Putnam v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.