Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 2018No. A161664PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

*437Petitioner petitions for judicial review of a decision by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision setting a 169-month post-prison supervision term. Petitioner assigns error to the board's time calculation, wherein the board did not subtract petitioner's time served on his probationary sentence, prior to his probation revocation sanction, from the post-prison supervision (PPS) term the board imposed upon petitioner's completion of his prison sentence. We affirm the board's order.

The relevant facts are not disputed. When petitioner was sentenced in October 1995 for two counts of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Preston-MittaschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Dept. of Human Services v. D. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. D. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. S. G. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. SolanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API