Legal Opinion

Saleeby v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1985No. S.F. 24695PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, J.

In this original proceeding petitioner Charles Saleeby seeks an order requiring the State Bar (bar) to adopt rules governing its exercise of discretion in administering the Client Security Fund (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6140.5, hereinafter CSF) and to set aside its order granting petitioner less than the full amount of reimbursement which he requested. We will conclude that the procedures followed by the bar are insufficient because they fail to provide a record upon which judicial review may be had and deny due process and that the bar therefore must formulate new rules. We will…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Brosterhous v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. In Re Attorney Discipline SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API