Combined Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
It is clear from the facts in this case that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover. See Mahoning Investment Co. v. United States, 3 F.Supp. 622, 78 Ct.Cl. 231; Wilson & Co., Inc., v. United States, 15 F.Supp. 332, 82 Ct.Cl. _, decided January 6, 1936.
Plaintiff had no taxable income for 1923, but, on the contrary, it had a loss. In the consolidated return which the plaintiff filed for itself and the Parker Sheet Metal Works for 1923 plaintiff deducted its loss of $2,476.33 from the net income of $17,495.45 of the Parker Sheet Metal Works and remitted to the collector the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mahoning Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Muir v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Wilson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- J. C. Pitman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Stahmann v. VidalSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- J. C. Pitman & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.