Legal Opinion

Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 4, 1939No. 41974, 42116PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The tax and interest of $402,397.79 herein sought to be recovered for. 1918 and 1920 were paid in cash and by credit well within the statutory period of limitation within which the tax could be assessed and collected. The credit of $64,423.90, overpayment for 1919, in part satisfaction of the deficiency for 1918 was entered by the collector on his books on June 30, 1926, and the balance of the deficiencies was paid on July 17, 1926. The statutory period of limitation with respect to assessment of the deficiencies for 1918 and 1920 was extended by waivers to December 31, 1926,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. American Equitable Assur. Co. of New York v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. Van Antwerp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Ventura Consolidated Oil Fields v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Mahoning Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. F.B. Blansett and Ethel Blansett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Decker v. KorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Gregory v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  4. Ryan v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Haley v. CommissionerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API