Legal Opinion

Muir v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1933No. L-183PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the assessment in 1924 of the tax upon the income of his wife for 1919 was void because there was no such person as “Mary Muir” in existence at the time the assessment was made; that the assessment was the same as if it had been made against a fictitious person; that collection thereof from plaintiff by credit was illegal; and that, since a legal assessment of the tax against plaintiff as executor of the estate of Mary Muir is barred by the statute of limitation,, the amount of $157,680.46 of plaintiff’s overpayment for 1919 retained and applied by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daube v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. Meyersdale Fuel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arthur C. Ewing A/K/A A. Clifford Ewing Maxine H. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. Mahoning Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  3. MacAtee, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  5. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API