Stahmann v. Vidal
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
We are to- decide whether the petitioners may maintain an action to- recover from a collector of internal revenue sums paid by them as taxes assessed under the Bankhead Cotton Act.
During the crop year 1934-1935 the petitioners were engaged in growing cotton and produced a quantity in excess of the allotment for which, under the terms of the Act, they were entitled to obtain tax exemption certificates. Petitioners delivered the excess cotton to Santo Tomas Gin Company, which ginned it and filed returns with the respondent, as collector, showing a tax of some $13,000 due on the ginning. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wourdack v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Clift & Goodrich, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Ohio Locomotive Crane Co. v. DenmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Central Aguirre Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Combined Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Colorado National Bank of Denver v. BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- J. C. Pitman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Spence v. SpenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- National Bank v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.