Legal Opinion
Mahoning Inv. Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 5, 1933No. M-405, M-406PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.
The two cases above entitled have been submitted together upon the same evidence but upon different theories, the contention of the plaintiffs being that one or the other is entitled to recover the amount for which each brings suit, namely, $250,889.42 and interest, amounting to nearly half a million dollars.
The facts are undisputed. The two companies are affiliated, the Mahoning Investment Company being the parent company and owning all of the stock of the Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal & Iron Company. The tax involved is for 1918. On June 13, 1919, the investment company filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Daube v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Vohmann v. . MichelNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Daube v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Krenger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.