Legal Opinion

Wilson & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 6, 1936No. H-227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

The plaintiff is- the successor to the corporation of the same name engaged in what is commonly called the packing house business and seeks to recover income and profits tax which was paid by its predecessor for the year 1918. For convenience both in the findings and the opinion the name “plaintiff” is used as applying both to the old corporation, which was a New York corporation existing in 1918 and continuing in existence until 1926, and also to the plaintiff in this action, a Delaware corporation of- the same name which acquired the assets of the New York corporation.

The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Planters Cotton Oil Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Swift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. Mahoning Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  5. In re Temtor Corn & Fruit Products Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larchfield Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Grand Central Public Market, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
  3. Combined Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  4. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API