Legal Opinion
Mason v. Association for Independent Growth
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 17, 1993No. Civ. 91-2524PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff Mary Mason alleges, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., that she was denied a promotion by her former employer, The Association for Independent Growth (“TAIG”), because of her race and age. 1 Before me is a partial summary judgment motion filed by defendant TAIG, seeking to delimit the terms of plaintiffs damages (doc. #37). Mason has responded to this motion. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion will be denied insofar as it seeks to limit…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Suzanne J. GOSS, Appellant in No. 83-1598 v. EXXON OFFICE SYSTEMS COMPANY, Appellant in No. 83-1557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bullock v. Children's Hosp. of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Harris v. SmithKline BeechamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Ferris v. Pennsylvania Federation Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Davis v. Los Angeles Unified School District Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.