Legal Opinion
John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 3, 1995No. 94-3182, 94-3208PublishedCited by 283 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
AppellanVcross-appellee Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”) appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denying Westinghouse’s post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict,1 a new trial or a remittitur of damages on appellee/cross-appellant John D. Starceski’s (“Starceski”) claim for violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 621 et seq. (West 1985 & Supp.1994). Starceski cross-appeals other parts of the same order that denied his…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by283 opinions
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Quantum Chemical Corp. v. ToenniesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Smith v. City of AllentownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
278 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.