New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The New York City Transit Authority refuses to employ persons who use methadone. The District Court found that this policy violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In a subsequent opinion, the court also held that the policy violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court of Appeals affirmed without reaching the statutory question. The departure by those courts from the procedure normally followed in addressing statutory and con*571stitutional questions in the same case, as well as concern that the merits of these important questions had been decided…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by629 opinions
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
624 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.