Legal Opinion

Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1944No. Civ. 12643PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro term.

Respondent, as plaintiff, recovered a judgment, on the verdict of a jury, of $10,000 for personal injuries. On August 20, 1941, respondent, while working with his back toward an electric crane operated by appellant’s employee, was crushed between the crane and an upright steel beam in the plate shop of appellant. Respondent was an apprentice electrician employed by Buzzell Electrical Works and working with, and under the immediate direction of, one Schnipper, a journeyman electrician. Buzzell Electrical Works had a contract with appellant to make all the electrical…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Deevy v. TassiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. United States v. Alice L. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Bihun v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Morris v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API