Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. W. E. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Upon the trial of this cause the plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant appeals therefrom and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The action was brought by the plaintiff, the husband of Adeline B. Redfield, to recover for the loss of the services *223of his wife from May 6 to June 29, 1893, and for necessary medical and surgical attendance during said period, resulting from an injury to the wife alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for seventeen hundred dollars, and judgment was entered for that sum. The errors…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Monaghan v. Pacific Rolling Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Shafter v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Spolter v. Four-Wheel Brake Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Meek v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Texas Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Martin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.