Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 9, 2007No. Civil Action 06-633 (RBW)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Carol Smith, brings this action on behalf of herself and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Erika Smith, the plaintiffs deceased daughter, against the United States of America (the “government”) for alleged “gross negligence and reckless acts and omissions,” Amended Complaint for Damages (the “Amended Complaint” or “Am. Compl.”) at 1, by the United States Parole Commission (the “USPC”), the Federal Bureau of Prisons (the “BOP”), and the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (the “CSOSA”) that resulted in the…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kach v. Hose ex rel. St. Moritz Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Williams v. ChuDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Highland Renovation Corp. v. Hanover Insurance GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.