Legal Opinion
Bell v. AT & T
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1991No. 90-6201PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Linda F. Bell appeals the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma on her claim brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1988). In addition to arguing that the district court’s judgment is clearly erroneous, Ms. Bell…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Branson v. Price River Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Drake v. City of Fort CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Considine v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Neal v. RocheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Arnold v. Riddell, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.