Legal Opinion
Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1998No. 96-6087, 96-6145PublishedCited by 284 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from a reduction in force (“RIF”) instituted in 1993 by defendant Sea-gate Technology, Inc., a manufacturer of computer equipment. As a result of the RIF, more than 200 employees at Seagate’s Oklahoma City facility were laid off. Many of the laid-off employees had worked at the Oklahoma City facility for more than a decade. Some of the plaintiffs in this case had more than twenty years seniority when they were let go. Twenty-seven former employees sued Seagate for violation of various federal and state antidiscrimination laws. Some of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by284 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Terry N. Garrett v. Hewlett-Packard Company, a California Company Authorized to Do Business in the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
279 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.