Legal Opinion
Neal v. Roche
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 17, 2003No. 02-6381PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Vanessa A. Neal, an African-American, brought this Title VII action against her employer, the Secretary of the Air Force, contending that the employer engaged in racial discrimination by selecting a less qualified white woman to fill a job opening. 1 In response to the employer’s assertion that it selected the white candidate because of her experience and knowledge, plaintiff argued that the employer had a concealed motive for its actions:. a desire to rescue the successful white candidate from being laid off. In Randle v. City of Aurora, 69 F.3d 441 (10th…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sealock v. State Of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Ofelia Randle v. City of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Terry N. Garrett v. Hewlett-Packard Company, a California Company Authorized to Do Business in the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Adamson v. Multi Community Diversified Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Jaramillo v. Colorado Judicial DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Swackhammer v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Village of Freeport v. BarrellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Barry v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.