Legal Opinion
Considine v. Newspaper Agency Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1994No. 92-4170PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
A group of former and present employees (“Plaintiffs”) of the Newspaper Agency Corporation (“NAC”) allege that the Salt Lake Typographical Union No. 115 (“Local 115”) and the Communications Workers of America (“CWA”) breached a duty of fair representation under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), codified at 29 U.S.C. § 185. Four of the Plaintiffs further allege that NAC violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. § 626. The district court granted the unions’ summary judgment motion on the § 301 claim. The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Ball v. RennerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Robert S, FURR, Leslie Woosley, Bernard E. Ozinga, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Heno v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Gardetto v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Rick Webb v. Abf Freight System, Inc., a Corporation, and Teamsters Local Union No. 17Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.