Legal Opinion
Branson v. Price River Coal Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1988No. 86-1467PublishedCited by 353 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, Faye Branson and Christine Saccomanno, claim they were discriminato-rily discharged by the defendant, Price River Coal Company, because of their age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (ADEA). Mrs. Saccomanno also claims Price River did not recall her to a position that became available after her layoff because of her age.
After complete discovery, full briefing, and oral argument by both sides, the district court granted Price River’s motion for summary judgment, 627 F.Supp. 324. The court found that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Maud Lee THORNBROUGH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLUMBUS AND GREENVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Smith v. FlaxCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Rudolph STECKL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Wilbur L. KEPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSTITUTE OF GAS TECHNOLOGY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by353 opinions
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Morgan v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- McKnight v. Kimberly Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
348 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.