Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Palmen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 28, 1999No. C2-97-1546PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
In this action, Deborah Lee Schneider, claiming unjust enrichment, seeks to recover $48,051.03 from the estate of John Michael Palmen for cash she allegedly expended, goods and services she allegedly provided, and improvements she allegedly made to a log cabin retirement home she and Palmen were building in Wisconsin. Schneider and Palmen were not married, but lived together for over ten years. Upon Palmen’s death, Schneider filed a claim with the Personal Representative for Palmen’s estate. The Personal Representative denied the claim and eventually moved for summary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re Estate of EriksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marriage of Goldman v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Estate of JanecekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-DodgeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Opus Northwest, L.L.C. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.