Legal Opinion

Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 1999No. C4-99-161PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge

This action arises from appellant Raymond Scott’s purchases of two Dodge Caravans from respondent Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge. Scott alleged that Forest Lake Chrysler violated the Minnesota Motor Vehicle Retail Installment Sales Act (MMVRISA) by using a conditional delivery agreement and by failing to provide him with copies of retail installment contracts signed by Forest Lake Chrysler. Scott also alleged that Forest Lake Chrysler violated the Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Forest Lake Chrysler…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. St. Croix Printing Equipment, Inc. v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Anker v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Commissioner of Revenue v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth DodgeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-DodgeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API