Opus Northwest, L.L.C. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of its motion for attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Minneapolis Community Development Agency filed a petition to condemn property belonging to respondent Opus Northwest, L.L.C. In response,- respondent filed a suit against the City of Minneapolis and appellant, challenging both the formation of a tax increment financing (TIF) district to finance the project and the alleged statutory public purpose for acquiring the property, which is located along Nicollet Mall in downtown…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Wegner v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Fownes v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Condemnation by the Minneapolis of Certain Lands in the MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Anderson v. City of CokatoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008