Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Eriksen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1983No. CX-82-1421PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Karen Wicklund, personal representative of Jorgen M. Eriksen’s estate, appeals from an order of the Hennepin County District Court, Probate Court Division, which allowed a claim by Pamela A. Potvin against decedent’s estate. Potvin sought to establish a one-half interest in a home which she and Eriksen shared, although legal title was solely in Eriksen. Based on the factual findings of the referee, the probate court allowed Potvin’s claim and created a constructive trust consisting of a one-half interest in the home. Wicklund argues on appeal that Minn.Stat. § 513.075 (1982)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Stater Ex Rel. Carlton v. WeedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Blumenthal v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  3. McKechnie v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hollom v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Rock v. Hennepin Broadcasting Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API