Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Janecek
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 18, 2000No. C2-99-1437PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
The question presented to us in this matter is whether an interlocutory appeal may be brought from a district court order disqualifying a personal representative’s attorney in a probate proceeding. The Minnesota Court of Appeals dismissed personal representative William Haugh’s (Haugh) appeal from a district court order that disqualified Kenneth J. Rohleder (Rohleder) from continuing as Haugh’s attorney in his capacity as personal representative. The court of appeals stated that Minn.Stat. § 525.71 (1998) contained an exclusive list of appealable orders from a probate…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Lennartson v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights, A14-1992Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.