Charlotte Guyer & Associates v. Franklin Factors
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.
Plaintiffsued for an accounting, damages for usury arising from successive agreements to factor accounts receivable, and damages for breach of contract based on revocation of a check drawn by defendant in favor of plaintiff. The court found the first factoring agreement to be usurious but held the second free of the taint. Damages for revocation of the check were refused. Thereupon, the court struck a balance on the accounting in favor of plaintiff. Being dissatisfied with the judgment as rendered plaintiff has taken this appeal.
Plaintiff was in the business of selling ladies’ garments to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Heald v. Friis-HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Beneficial Loan Society, Ltd. v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Hiroshima v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Leonard v. GallagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Bayne v. JolleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.