Legal Opinion
Harris v. Foxx
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 6, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0162PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Exhibits
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Mr. Bruce Harris, brings Rehabilitation Act claims against his employer, the Department of Transportation. The Department reassigned Mr. Harris to a different job when his disability prevented him from completing his original job duties. Mr. Harris argues that the Department reassigned him into a job for which he was not qualified instead of other vacant jobs for which he was qualified, thereby…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Matos v. DevosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Mercado Cordova v. Walmart Puerto Rico, Inc.United States District Court · 2019
- Bullock v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Congress v. McWilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Harbour v. University Club of WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.