Legal Opinion

Coulibaly v. Kerry

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 30, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-0189PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting in Part and Denying in Part Dependants’ Motion To Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave To File Fourth Amended Complaint; Granting Plaintiff’s Motion To Add Newly Acquired Evidence

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Dr. Tiemoko Coulibaly, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action against the United States, the Secretary of State, and twelve other individuals who are current or former employees of the U.S. Department of State, the Merit Systems Protection Board…

2Cases cited162 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

157 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Coulibaly v. PompeoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Green v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Coulibaly v. TillersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Otero v. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Richardson v. SaulsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API