Atwood Resources, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Appellant presents eight propositions of law. Two relate to a matter not properly before us, and *98six are without merit. Therefore, we affirm the order of the commission.

In its first two propositions of law, Atwood essentially argues that Columbia’s complaint fails to satisfy the requirements of R.C. 4905.26, which provides in part:

“Upon complaint in writing against any public utility by any person, firm, or corporation, or upon the initiative or complaint ■ of the public utilities commission, that any rate, fare, charge, toll, rental, schedule, classification, or service, or any joint rate,…