Legal Opinion

Industrial Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1939No. 27227PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Is the appellant, The Industrial Gas Company, a public utility under the undisputed facts ¶ If so, it is subject to regulation and, moreover, the order of the appellee, the Public Utilities Commission, denying release therefrom, must be affirmed.

Under Sections 614-2 (amended 116 Ohio Laws, pt. 2, 309, effective April 5, 1937), 6U-2a and 614-3, General Code, a person, partnership, association or corpora tion “engaged in the business of supplying natural gas for lighting, power or heating purposes to consumers within this state” or “in the business of transporting natural gas * '* * through…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Davis v. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  5. Clarksburg Light & Heat Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. City of St. Marys v. Auglaize County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Toledo Edison Co. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Public Service Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1947

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API