Legal Opinion
City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1949No. 31613PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.
Under Sections 614-44 and 3982, General Code, the city fixed by ordinances the rates that the gas company might charge or collect for supplying gas in Cincinnati for the two-year period from June 30, 1944, to July 1, 1946, and for the two-year period from June 30, 1946, to July 1, 1948. Section 614-44 provides for a written complaint such as was made by the gas company after passage of each of the ordinances, and for a hearing by the commission on each such complaint.
Under Section 614-46, General Code, if the commission, after such a hearing, is of the opinion that the ■rates so fixed by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Zier v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Halkias v. Wilkoff Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.