Hickman v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Linn district court; JOHN C. CANNON, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
The action in the district court was on a promissory note. The defense was a failure of consideration; the defendants recovered a judgment for costs, from which the plaintiff has appealed.
The note was executed by the defendants November 21, 1906, payable to the order of J. Crouch & Son, in payment of a stallion purchased for breeding purposes. The petition alleged that the note' was endorsed in due course before maturity to the National Fowler Bank of LaFayette, Ind., and that the bank endorsed it to the plaintiff for full value. The answer…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. Russell & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Babcock v. D. Deford & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Nichols-Shepard Co. v. RhoadmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Furneaux v. EsterlySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Bomberger, Wright & Co. v. GrienerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kraisinger v. LiggettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. SchierkolkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Fisk v. NeptuneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Union Investment Co. v. F. M. Landon Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Cooper v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.