Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Ragsdale

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1915No. 19,760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This is an action on a promissory note. The plaintiff recovered judgment. Defendants Burr, the two *773Lights, and Kirk appeal. The defense was fraud and breach of warranty.

On November 1, 1910, the plaintiff sold to the defendants a stallion under the following warranty:

“If the above named stallion does not get 60 per cent of the producing mares and Alleys with foal with proper care and handling, I agree to replace him free of charge with another of same value upon the delivery to me of the stallion in as sound and good condition as he is at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People's State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. Denver Horse Importing Co. v. SchaferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  3. Hallowell v. McLaughlin Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Hickman v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Bracken v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dold v. SherowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Jones v. WebberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. SchierkolkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API