Furneaux v. Esterly
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Brown District Court. At the September Term, 1884, plaintiffs George Esterly & Son recovered a judgment for $122.50 and costs against defendant Ewrneaux. He brings this judgment here for review-The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This action was brought upon a promissory
note for $100, which was one of a series given by John Furneaux in payment of a harvester, and was made payable directly to George Esterly & Son, of Whitewater, Wisconsin, who were the manufacturers of the harvester, and were the plaintiffs below. The machine was purchased upon the following conditional warranty and agreement:
“This machine is well made, of good material, and under *540proper management is capable of doing first-class work, the purchaser agreeing to see that the machine is properly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nichols, Shepherd & Co. v. LarkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Bomberger, Wright & Co. v. GrienerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. HailNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by13 opinions
- Murphy v. Russell & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
- Somerville v. Gullett Gin Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Cannon v. BurrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Main v. Griffin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co v. WierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.