Legal Opinion

Furneaux v. Esterly

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Brown District Court. At the September Term, 1884, plaintiffs George Esterly & Son recovered a judgment for $122.50 and costs against defendant Ewrneaux. He brings this judgment here for review-The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This action was brought upon a promissory

note for $100, which was one of a series given by John Furneaux in payment of a harvester, and was made payable directly to George Esterly & Son, of Whitewater, Wisconsin, who were the manufacturers of the harvester, and were the plaintiffs below. The machine was purchased upon the following conditional warranty and agreement:

“This machine is well made, of good material, and under *540proper management is capable of doing first-class work, the purchaser agreeing to see that the machine is properly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nichols, Shepherd & Co. v. LarkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Bomberger, Wright & Co. v. GrienerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. HailNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Russell & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Somerville v. Gullett Gin Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cannon v. BurrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Main v. Griffin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co v. WierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API