Legal Opinion

Fisk v. Neptune

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1915No. 19,585PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wilson district court; James W. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Lawrence Fisk, the owner of a farm, on September 23, 1912, leased it to H. J. Neptune for a period ending March 1, 1914. Neptune occupied the leased premises until December 8, 1913, when he left without notice to his landlord. Fisk brought action against Neptune for damages resulting from his failure to comply with the terms of the lease in various respects. A jury returned a verdict for the defendant, on which a judgment was rendered, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The contention of the plaintiff is that the verdict was not supported by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cobe v. Coughlin Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Hickman v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fenn v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. State ex rel. Carmons v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Kraisinger v. LiggettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  4. Smith v. GreggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Trustees of the Baker University v. FarrarSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API