Legal Opinion

Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. Schierkolk

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 12, 1915No. 19,525PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Washington. district court; John Cl Hogin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

On January 2, 1912, the Aultman & Taylor Machinery Company brought replevin against E. Sehierkolk for the recovery of a quantity of machinery on which it had a chattel mortgage. Judgment was rendered for the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The mortgage was for $2406. Of this amount $1500 represented the purchase price of an engine bought by the defendant from the plaintiff. The defendant maintained that he had been induced to buy it by fraudulent representations concerning it, that he had rescinded the contract of purchase, and that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Epp v. HintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Hickman v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Aultman, Miller & Co. v. MickeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  5. Gale Sulky Harrow Manufacturing Co. v. StarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Niles v. DanforthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Varney v. National City BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co. v. SchierkolkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Jones v. ChubbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API