Legal Opinion
Union Investment Co. v. F. M. Landon Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 1916No. Civ. No. 1583PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This action is on a promissory note, and is the culmination of a transaction whereby the defendants bought from the named payees of said note, McLaughlin Brothers, a Pereheron stallion, named Gluton, for the sum of one thousand two hundred dollars.
The note was executed at Anderson, Shasta County, on the twentieth day of August, 1910, and made payable on the first day of July, 1912. The complaint alleges the payment of the sum of $225 thereon and that the balance, $975, with accrued interest, remains unpaid; that the defendants have refused and still refuse to pay said balance. The assignment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Russell & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Oltmanns Bros. v. PolandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Nichols-Shepard Co. v. RhoadmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Crouch & Son v. LeakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Highsmith v. HammondsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gonsalves v. HodgsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Monarch Brewing Co. v. George J. Meyer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Artukovich v. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Edson v. ManceboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Beckley v. ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925