Legal Opinion

State v. Teal

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 2004No. 74569-2PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

96 P.3d 974 (2004)

152 Wash.2d 333

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

DeWayne H. TEAL, Petitioner.

No. 74569-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 24, 2004.

Decided September 2, 2004.

Eric Broman, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Seth Aaron Fine, Snohomish County Pros. Office, Everett, for Respondent.

JOHNSON, J.

This case requires us to determine whether sufficient evidence existed to convict the defendant of first degree robbery where a "to convict" jury instruction only referred to the acts of the "defendant" and not to the acts of the "defendant or an accomplice." The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CarothersWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 2015

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API