Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2015No. 89917-7PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 In November 2009, Maurice Clemmons shot and killed four Lakewood police officers. Darcus Dewayne Allen, the petitioner in this case, drove Clemmons to and from the crime scene and was charged as an accomplice. We must decide whether the prosecuting attorney committed prejudicial misconduct by misstating the standard upon which the jury may convict an accomplice. In a divided decision, the Court of Appeals recognized that the statements were improper but ultimately held that they did not amount to prejudicial misconduct. State v. Allen, 178 Wn. App. 893, 317 P.3d 494 (2014). We reverse.

¶2…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. ThorgersonWashington Supreme Court · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. DreewesWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State Of Washington v. Nathaniel Shane ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. In Re The Detention Of: Charles UrlacherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Chmukh v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API