Legal Opinion

State v. Fisher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2009No. 79801-0PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 — Timothy Scott Fisher seeks review of an unpublished Court of Appeals, Division Three, decision affirming Fisher’s guilty verdict on four counts of child molestation. Fisher claims he deserves a new trial based on the following assignments of error: improper admission of misconduct evidence under ER 404(b), prosecutorial misconduct, erroneous exclusion of bias evidence, and inadequate jury instructions. We hold Fisher did not receive a fair trial and reverse the Court of Appeals.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 In 2003, Melanie Lincoln told her mother, Judy Ward, that Fisher had…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. State v. ThorgersonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. MondayWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. MondayWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API