Legal Opinion

State v. Evans

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2005No. Nos. 74851-9; 75766-6PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 After Apprendi, every fact (other than the fact of a prior conviction) that increases the defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum may be used only if it was either proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the trier of fact at trial or admitted by the defendant. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S. Ct. 2348,147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000) (citing Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227, 252-53, 119 S. Ct. 1215, 143 L. Ed. 2d 311 (1999) (Stevens, J., concurring)). In Blakely, the Supreme Court clarified that the “statutory maximum” did not refer to the maximum sentence authorized by…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. MondayWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. MondayWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2005

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API