Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beck v. Goldman Jewelry Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1935No. 32,629PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This is an original proceeding to determine whether the defendant corporation is engaged in practicing optometry, and if so, to oust it from exercising any business as a corporation within the state. The state demurs to defendant’s answer and asks for judgment on the pleadings.

It is not necessary to state the allegations of the petition which was filed on July 19, 1935. The defendant corporation’s answer, filed September 5, 1935, admits that it is a Missouri corporation authorized to engage in the “retail jewelry business” in Kansas; that it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. In Re Disbarment of George H. OtternessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. State v. Kindy Optical Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Depew v. Wichita Ass'n of Credit MenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Eisensmith v. Buhl Optical Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. United States v. Arthur R. Kintner and Alyce KintnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Dvorine v. Castelberg Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Ezell v. RitholzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API