Legal Opinion

Parvin v. Wimberg

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1892No. 16,312PublishedCited by 95 opinions

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

At the November election for the year 1890' the appellant and Henry Stockfleth were opposing candidates for the office of county auditor of Vanderburgh county in this State.

The board of canvassers having declared the appellant duly elected, this proceeding was commenced by the appellee Henry Wimberg before the board of commissioners of that county,to contest the election upon the alleged ground that Stock-fleth had received more votes for the office than had been cast for the appellant.

The cause was appealed to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court, from which a change of venue was granted to the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. SaronySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Stuart v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Gilleland v. SchuylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. City of Evansville v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API